With the pep rallies concluded, Democratic and Republican captains and their teams are charging onto the field to commence a battle for the White House unlike any other. The game plans couldn't be more different on issues like immigration, regulations and taxes, but on trade there doesn't seem to be any line of scrimmage at all. But on this one, Trump is on offense and Clinton, defense.

A friend suggested the other day that “if we are in a recession, at least we can now begin looking forward to the recovery.” The economy has certainly received some serious knocks lately and one could easily make the case that the two-year recovery is in trouble. Supply disruptions from Japan’s earthquake dealt the first blow followed by an equally devastating rise in oil and gasoline prices. Then came the political train wreck over the debt ceiling with questionable warnings of US default coupled with more substantial threat of a downgrade of US debt (S&P has not yet announced their decision). Add Europe’s debt problems and emerging market slowdowns and the global picture gets darker.  

George Bernard Shaw once said “if all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a conclusion.” Someone later added that laying them end to end would not necessarily be a bad thing. At any rate, Bloomberg news reports that 67 of them recently polled, called for economic growth to resume in the second half of this year. The median estimate is for 3.2% growth following a disappointing 2.3% this latest quarter. They say that “rising exports, stable fuel prices, record levels of cash in company coffers and easier lending rules will be enough to overcome the damage done by one-time events like poor weather and the disaster in Japan.” They also expect that the Fed will wait even longer to raise interest rates next year.

A basic tenant in negotiating is to start with an extreme position from which you allow your opponent to gain ground against, but only to a point that is better than or at your original objective. Have we as a ‘civilization’ gotten so accomplished to negotiating/posturing our own objectives that we completely lose sight of the greater good? You name the arena and it seems that leaders on both or more sides are so entrenched in their own beliefs and positions that no middle ground exists. Seemingly unsolvable conflicts abound, in the NFL, state houses, Washington, Pakistan v. India, Pakistan v. US, even Israel v. the US: The sense of urgency or the bigger picture are held hostage by ideology or greed. It’s the story of mankind, but it just seems louder and more prevalent lately.